Icular around the in the Museo Egizio, was found [2]. In toIcular around the of

Icular around the in the Museo Egizio, was found [2]. In to
Icular around the of your Museo Egizio, was located [2]. In to this, the only documente of the dust along with the consolidation on the preparation and paint have been carried out, using the on a securing remedy carried around the artefact by Luigi Vigna, at that time directo aim of enabling a appropriate reading and a protected handling from the object. Additional maintenance conservation laboratory of to place chronologically have been [2]. Within this context, the r interventions, which are difficult the Museo Egizio, was foundindeed carried out: as an illustration a modern nail inserted to reinforce the assembly of theand was clearly detected out, w in the dust and the consolidation of the preparation arm paint have been carried by X-rayallowing a right reading and a secure handling with the object. Additional major aim of radiography (not shown right here). Taking into consideration the complicated layering of materials, it was necessary to have an understanding of if interventions, that are difficult to place chronologically happen to be indeed carr the DNQX disodium salt manufacturer cleaning operations had to become restricted towards the surface dirt, or in the event the removal of one particular orfor instance a modern nail inserted to reinforce the assembly on the arm was detected by X-ray radiography (not shown right here). Taking into consideration the complicated layering of components, it was necessary to Bomedemstat Epigenetic Reader Domain understan cleaning operations had to become limited towards the surface dirt, or in the event the removal of oneCoatings 2021, 11,four ofCoatings 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW4 ofmore paint layers may be considered, if these were demonstrated to be non-original. In specific, the characterization in the brown top layer seemed vital: even if not visible close to for the gaps, and hence, apparently not applied following some deterioration, with out with out more data it its not probable to not doable to exclude in advance more info on its nature,onwas nature, it was exclude ahead of time its pertinence to a its pe non-originalapatina. Moreover, it’s worth noting that the superficial dirtthe superficial dirt wa tinence to non-original patina. Furthermore, it can be worth noting that was placed on top of a rough, porousrough, porousfragileextremely fragile surface, which could have mad placed on best of a and extremely and surface, which could have created the cleaning operation especially difficult (Figure three). the cleaning operation particularly difficult (Figure 3).Figure Detail of of back of the the study. It can be noticed that different paint layers are covered Figure 3. 3. Detail thethe back of case case study. It may be noticed that distinctive paint layers are covere with dust. with dust.Archaeological painting supplies because the the Egyptian ones, generally strongly waterArchaeological painting supplies as Egyptian ones, are are generally strongly water-sen sensitive, andcannot be cleaned with traditional gels gels including agarose-based ones. Howeve sitive, and can’t be cleaned with classic for instance agarose-based ones. Nevertheless, in consideration of the lack of superficial cohesion with the components, any mechanical action, in consideration in the lack of superficial cohesion with the components, any mechanical action as that associated with dry cleaning procedures, may well happen to be as well stressful for the surface. as that connected with dry cleaning procedures, might have been as well stressful for the su Hence, it was decided to compare conventional dry-cleaning approaches, extensively tested and face. For that reason, it was decided to evaluate regular dry-cleaning techniques, commonly applied on archaeological polychromies [7], with innovative very ret.