0 and G230) fractions from micronized samples, semolina Antalis_MA. Various letters0 and G230) fractions from

0 and G230) fractions from micronized samples, semolina Antalis_MA. Various letters
0 and G230) fractions from micronized samples, semolina Antalis_MA. Different letters 3.G250 and G230) obtained from Saragolla_LA, Antalis_BA and Antalis_MA. Distinctive letters Figure indicate particle sizesignificant difference (p 0.05, n = 2) within every cultivar sample. frac(F250, Imply statistically fractions of micronized samples, semolina and GS-626510 Cancer air-classified tions (F250,statistically G230) obtained from Saragolla_LA, Antalis_BA and Antalis_MA. Distinct indicate G250 and important difference (p 0.05, n = 2) inside every cultivar sample. lettersAsh Content three.3. indicate statistically substantial distinction (p 0.05, n = two) within each and every cultivar sample.3.3. Generally, ash content of micronized samples and bran-enriched fractions was sigAsh Content material three.3. Ash Content0.05) greater compared to that of semolinabran-enriched fractions was considerably (p ash content material of micronized samples and (Figure 4). Amongst F fractions, Generally, Normally, 0.05) larger compared to to of semolina (Figure four). fractions fractions, ash content(p ash content material of(Antalis_BA)samples(Antalis_MA), which was drastically nificantly ranged from 2.46 micronized that2.10 and bran-enriched Amongst Fwas significantly (p0.05) than in G, when compared with thatto 2.10 (Antalis_MA),4). Amongst F fractions, ash content material 0.05) greater varying from 1.89 (Antalis BA) to 1.59 which was drastically higher (p ranged from 2.46 (Antalis_BA) of semolina (Figure (Antalis_MA). ash content 0.05) than in2.46varying from 1.89 (Antalis BA) to 1.59 (Antalis_MA). greater (p ranged from G, (Antalis_BA) to two.ten (Antalis_MA), which was drastically larger (p 0.05) than in G, varying from 1.89 (Antalis BA) to 1.59 (Antalis_MA).Figure 4. Mean values of ash content material (d.m. ) of five milling items: micronized sample, semolina, Figure 4. Imply values of ash content material (d.m. ) of 5 milling merchandise: micronized sample, semolina, F250, G250 and G230 air-classified fractions obtained from Saragolla_LA, Antalis_BA and Antalis_MA. F250, G250 and G230 air-classified fractions obtained from Saragolla_LA, Antalis_BA and Antalis_MA. Various letters indicate statistically substantial differences micronizedeach cultivar sample. Figure 4. Imply values of ash content material (d.m. ) of five milling(p 0.05, n(p 0.05, n = sample, semolina, Diverse letters indicate statistically important differences solutions: = three) inside 3) within every single cultivar sample. F250, G250 and G230 air-classified fractions obtained from Saragolla_LA, Antalis_BA and Anta3.4. Alveographic Properties of Air-Classified Fractions lis_MA. Various letters indicate statistically important differences (p 0.05, n = three) within each and every cultivar sample. Alveographic parameters of air-classified fractions, in comparison with the corre-sponding semolina samples, showed an improved P/L ratio (Table two). When semolina samples showed P/L ratios ranging from a minimum of 1.49 0.15 (Antalis_BA) to a maximum of 3.96 0.38 (Saragolla_LA), larger values were observed in air-classified fractions, varying from four.69 0.21 (Antalis_BA G250) to 11.32 0.08 (Antalis_MA F250). The W parameters showed more homogeneous values in between air-classified fractions andFoods 2021, 10,8 ofsemolina and also a narrower C2 Ceramide Protocol variety of variation (i.e., from 133 20 J0-4 (Antalis_BA F250) to 286 48 J0-4 (Antalis_MA semolina).Table 2. Alveographic parameters of semolina and F250, G250 and G230 air-classified fractions obtained from three durum grain samples (Saragolla_LA, Antalis_BA, Antalis_MA). Various lette.