Quality' Table two. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentages): 'Do you believe that organic Answers

Quality” Table two. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentages): “Do you believe that organic Answers Year Healthier Tastier Extra Attractive Greater Quality foods are healthier, tastier, more appealing, or of higher quality”Definitely yes AnswersDefinitely yes Rather yesRather noRather noRather yesDefinitely noDefinitely noI Idon’t know never know2016 Year 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2019 2016 2016 2019 2019 2016 2016 201920.Healthier 22.14 20.21 56.86 22.14 56.22 56.86 15.53 56.22 13.78 15.53 13.78 three.53 three.53 three.84 three.84 3.86 three.86 four.01 4.7.72 Tastier 10.11 7.72 33.53 10.11 37.68 33.53 38.29 37.68 32.75 38.29 32.75 7.72 7.72 eight.19 eight.19 12.74 12.74 11.28 11.four.Additional Attractive 9.94 four.52 26.13 9.94 31.83 26.13 47.33 31.83 37.43 47.33 37.43 12.24 12.24 10.69 10.69 9.78 9.78 ten.11 ten.27.Higher Excellent 24.06 27.36 49.06 24.06 52.05 49.06 15.37 52.05 14.12 15.37 14.12 two.71 2.71 three.93 three.93 five.51 5.51 5.85 five.Source:Own calculations. Supply: Own calculations.2D Plot of Row and Column Coordinates; Dimension: 1 x two Input Table (Rows x Columns): 4 x five Standardization: Row and column profiles 0,Dimension 2; Eigenvalue: ,00173 (1,450 of (-)-Cedrene Biological Activity Inertia) 0,ten 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,02 0,00 -0,02 -0,04 -0,06 -0,08 -0,ten -0,12 -0,five -0,4 -0,three -0,2 -0,1 0,0 0,1 0,two I don’t know Tastier Certainly yes Healthier Higher Top quality Rather yes Rather not Surely not More Attractive 2D Plot of Row and Column Coordinates; Dimension: 1 x 2 Input Table (Rows x Columns): 4 x five Standardization: Row and column profilesDimension two; Eigenvalue: ,00654 (3,301 of Inertia)0,Healthier Rather yes Certainly not Extra Attractive0,0,00 Tastier -0,05 Higher Top quality Absolutely yes -0,Rather not-0,I do not know-0,20 -0,-0,-0,-0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,Dimension 1; Eigenvalue: ,18675 (94,22 of Inertia)Row.Coords Col.CoordsDimension 1; Eigenvalue: ,11656 (97,54 of Inertia)Row.Coords Col.CoordsFigure 2. Correspondence map: “Do you think that organic foods are: healthier, tastier, extra eye-catching, of larger quality” two. Correspondence map: “Do you think that organic foods are: healthier, tastier, extra appealing, of larger quality” Year 2016 year year 2019 (suitable). Source: Personal calculations. Year 2016 (left), (left),2019 (ideal). Supply: Own calculations.Table two and Figure 2 (proper) describe the situation in 2019. As outlined by the survey, organic food in 2019 was considered healthier, at the same time as of higher high quality than traditional meals, when not additional appealing; see the table as well as the correspondence map (p-value is much less than 0.001, chi-square = 572.13, degrees of freedom = 12). The survey revealed a positive shift in organic meals popularity, see Table three. The proportion of respondents who under no circumstances bought organic meals plunged to half of its original level. Having said that, we recorded a rise in the number of respondents who didn’t care whether or not it was organic or not. Substantial statistical dependence was verified (p-value is much less than 0.001, chi-square = 88.02, degrees of freedom = three).Agriculture 2021, 11,The survey revealed a positive shift in organic food recognition, see Table 3. The proportion of respondents who never ever bought organic meals plunged to half of its original level. Nonetheless, we recorded a rise in the quantity of respondents who didn’t care irrespective of whether it was organic or not. Considerable statistical dependence was confirmed (p-value is 7 of 16 less than 0.001, chi-square = 88.02, degrees of freedom = 3).Table 3. Contingency table, column relative frequencies (percentage.