Share this post on:

genetic status of primary cells may determine the functional effect of SYT-SSX, possibly including its transforming capacity. Despite numerous studies, MSCs are still ill-defined with respect to their physical, phenotypic and functional properties. The four independent hMSC populations used in the present study were isolated and cultured according to standard protocols and displayed homogeneity for expression of the handful of standard markers used for their isolation. Nevertheless they were derived from donors of different ages, albeit all younger than 16 years, and functional heterogeneity among them could not be excluded. We therefore compared the effect of SYT-SSX expression in the different hMSC populations. We first performed statistical analysis of transcriptome changes Aglafolin induced by SYT-SSX1 in each of the four different MSC isolates and found batch-MCE Chemical 474645-27-7 related variability in the transcription profiles with some genes affected in some of the batches but not in others and the same genes affected to varying degrees among the batches. Complete lists of genes affected by SYT-SSX1 in each single MSCs batch are reported in table S2. Among the genes that were affected in some populations but not in others several have been shown to be related to SYT-SSX expression in other studies. Ephrins provide one example of cell batch-dependent gene regulation by SYT-SSX. Several ephrin receptor/ephrin pathway components, including ephrin receptors A4, A8, B2 and B3 and ephrins B1, A3 and A4 have been recently shown to be induced by SYT-SSX2 in NIH3T3 and other cell lines of mesenchymal and epithelial origin. We observed a broad induction of ephrins and ephrin receptors in only a single hMSC population, where ephrins A1 and B3 and ephrin receptors B1, A4 and A3 were induced by SYT-SSX1. Among the other hMSC populations, ephrin B2 was repressed in 2 batches while ephrin receptor B1 was induced in batches 3 and 4 but not in the other 2 batches. Similarly, BCL2, one of the genes whose overexpression has even been suggested to constitute a molecular marker of synovial sarcoma, was induced in two batches of MSCs but not in the other two. Changes in expression, as assessed by microarray analysis, of BCL2, EPHA4 and EPHA3 were validate

Share this post on:

Author: calcimimeticagent