Share this post on:

owing that Msp22 has been annotated as a putative surface protein, we attempted to confirm the cell surface location of Msp22. However, using flow cytometry of both wild type and Msp22 overexpressing strains and polyclonal anti-Msp22 mouse sera, we could not detect this protein on the bacterial surface. This suggests that the protein is not surface exposed under the in vitro growth conditions tested in these studies. In order to elicit a protective immune response, one may speculate that Msp22 may become transiently exposed to the host’s immune system during infection. Unlike Msp22, OppA is accessible on the bacterial surface in vitro as confirmed by our studies, and antibody mediated neutralization of bacteria is therefore likely 18316589 to be an 22038495 important protective immune mechanism complementing native immune defenses against this antigen. Interestingly, in agreement with the data obtained by other researchers in this field, we could not detect significant differences in the antibody titers against the 8 tested antigens in; 1) sera from children with otitis media in the acute compared to the convalescent disease phase, or 2) in sera from children compared to sera from healthy individuals. The natural systemic IgG response observed in humans has therefore not provided any Apalutamide further validation of our selected eight antigens, but the selection as a vaccine candidate was rather based on the pulmonary clearance model. Furthermore, although UspA1, UspA2 and Hag/MID antigen specific antibodies were frequently found in both children and healthy individuals, there is no clear evidence that natural immune responses raised against other putative vaccine candidates contribute to protection. The question whether naturally induced antibodies against any M. catarrhalis antigens play a role in protection against otitis media has been previously raised, and our observations confirm that further investigations into the immune mechanisms operating during M. catarrhalis infection induced by this pathogen will be required. In addition, naturally occurring antibodies may exhibit different epitope specificity and avidity, compared to vaccine induced antibodies. But more importantly, systemic IgG levels do not adequately reflect mucosal immune responses. Thus, if mucosal immunity is more critical for protection against M. catarrhalis, serological studies based on serum samples collected from otitis media patients may be of limited value. Such a discrepancy between mucosal and systemic serological immune responses was 13 Protective Moraxella catarrhalis Antigens previously detected in otitis media patients against M. catarrhalis outer membrane antigens. In addition, the role of T cells for protection and B cell activity stimulation remains to be elucidated. Most recent studies suggested that M. catarrhalis is able to modulate mucosal epithelial responses and B cell adaptive immunity in such a way as to hinder the generation of antibodies with a correct function and epitope specificity. If this indeed turns out to be the case, vaccination with M. catarrhalis would be an extremely valuable approach in preventing infection by this pathogen. In terms of antigen validation, the detection of a natural immune response against the selected antigens indicated that they were expressed in vivo upon infection of the human host. In conclusion, comprehensive screening using the ANTIGENome technology has led to the identification of 214 antigenic proteins, with 3 of these being show

Share this post on:

Author: calcimimeticagent